<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Write HTML That Means Something</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donttrustthisguy.com/2008/04/04/write-html-that-means-something/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donttrustthisguy.com/2008/04/04/write-html-that-means-something/</link>
	<description>Why not take my word for it?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:55:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roi</title>
		<link>http://donttrustthisguy.com/2008/04/04/write-html-that-means-something/comment-page-1/#comment-5716</link>
		<dc:creator>Roi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donttrustthisguy.com/2008/04/06/write-html-that-means-something-3/#comment-5716</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Names Things What They Are - Not What They Look Like&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;!-- Start your comment below this line. --&gt;
So true!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Names Things What They Are &#8211; Not What They Look Like</p></blockquote>
<p><!-- Start your comment below this line. --><br />
So true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abdul</title>
		<link>http://donttrustthisguy.com/2008/04/04/write-html-that-means-something/comment-page-1/#comment-5505</link>
		<dc:creator>Abdul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 06:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donttrustthisguy.com/2008/04/06/write-html-that-means-something-3/#comment-5505</guid>
		<description>Yeah, although CSS containers works WAY better than tables but still I prefer tables sometimes because they make the whole thing a little less confusing for a guy like me who is not so fond of writing comments with the script! :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, although CSS containers works WAY better than tables but still I prefer tables sometimes because they make the whole thing a little less confusing for a guy like me who is not so fond of writing comments with the script! :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Less Markup Is Better Markup. &#124; DontTrustThisGuy.com</title>
		<link>http://donttrustthisguy.com/2008/04/04/write-html-that-means-something/comment-page-1/#comment-5124</link>
		<dc:creator>Less Markup Is Better Markup. &#124; DontTrustThisGuy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donttrustthisguy.com/2008/04/06/write-html-that-means-something-3/#comment-5124</guid>
		<description>[...] Unfortunately, life is not so simple for the HTML author. Technology binds us to complications that create an environment that is less precise, less absolute, than merely writing a sentence. But if you can put the pressures we face from design implementation and browser support aside to focus on the basic semantic meaning; you will find that the aforementioned complexity is quite easy to deal with by incorporating small tweaks to your HTML. Here are two primary points in regards to the over complexity of HTML when thinking in terms of implementation as opposed to meaning. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unfortunately, life is not so simple for the HTML author. Technology binds us to complications that create an environment that is less precise, less absolute, than merely writing a sentence. But if you can put the pressures we face from design implementation and browser support aside to focus on the basic semantic meaning; you will find that the aforementioned complexity is quite easy to deal with by incorporating small tweaks to your HTML. Here are two primary points in regards to the over complexity of HTML when thinking in terms of implementation as opposed to meaning. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s CSS Naked Day! &#124; DontTrustThisGuy.com</title>
		<link>http://donttrustthisguy.com/2008/04/04/write-html-that-means-something/comment-page-1/#comment-5100</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s CSS Naked Day! &#124; DontTrustThisGuy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donttrustthisguy.com/2008/04/06/write-html-that-means-something-3/#comment-5100</guid>
		<description>[...] this, you are seeing the pure semantic HTML markup of this site. This ties into a series of posts I started earlier this week on semantic HTML. More to come [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this, you are seeing the pure semantic HTML markup of this site. This ties into a series of posts I started earlier this week on semantic HTML. More to come [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://donttrustthisguy.com/2008/04/04/write-html-that-means-something/comment-page-1/#comment-5099</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 04:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donttrustthisguy.com/2008/04/06/write-html-that-means-something-3/#comment-5099</guid>
		<description>You know, it&#039;s sad this has to be told time and time again but I do agree with you that nobody takes this seriously.  A while back I bought &quot;HTML Mastery&quot; and everybody laughed at me, but it was just what you speak of - a reminder of how to code the foundation of your site well.  Most people don&#039;t, and that isn&#039;t cool.
Nice post, and thx for reminding ppl.
Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, it&#8217;s sad this has to be told time and time again but I do agree with you that nobody takes this seriously.  A while back I bought &#8220;HTML Mastery&#8221; and everybody laughed at me, but it was just what you speak of &#8211; a reminder of how to code the foundation of your site well.  Most people don&#8217;t, and that isn&#8217;t cool.<br />
Nice post, and thx for reminding ppl.<br />
Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
